Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) principles are central to modern corporate strategy within the European Union. This guide provides a structured overview of the core components of ESG, including its defining issues, the primary standards for reporting, and the evolving EU regulatory landscape. The content is specifically tailored to the European context, focusing on directives and frameworks such as the CSRD, ESRS, and the EU Taxonomy.
This document will cover the definition of ESG, the three pillars of Environmental, Social, and Governance, the key reporting standards, and the specific EU regulations that govern corporate sustainability. It is designed to provide a clear and methodical framework for organizations operating within the EU.
ESG Definition: What It Is and Why It Matters
ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance. It represents a set of criteria used to evaluate a company's performance in these three areas. Beyond financial metrics, ESG provides a holistic view of a company's impact and its long term sustainability. Investors, stakeholders, and regulators increasingly use ESG data to assess corporate responsibility, manage risk, and identify opportunities.
A high level of ESG performance indicates that a company is managing its environmental footprint, fostering responsible and positive social relationships, and maintaining robust and transparent governance structures. This has become a critical indicator of operational resilience and ethical conduct in the EU market. For a more detailed explanation of its core concepts and business relevance, please see our foundational article.
The Three Pillars of ESG
The ESG framework is built upon three distinct yet interconnected pillars. Each pillar addresses a specific set of issues and associated metrics that contribute to a company's overall sustainability profile. Understanding these issues is the first step toward effective ESG integration and reporting.
Environmental issues
Environmental issues relate to a company's impact on the natural world. This pillar assesses how an organization manages its resources, mitigates its negative impacts, and contributes to environmental preservation. Key areas of focus include:
- Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across Scopes 1, 2, and 3
- Energy consumption and efficiency measures
- Water usage and waste management practices
- Pollution and its impact on air, water, and soil
- Biodiversity and land use practices
- Circular economy initiatives and resource depletion
Social issues
Social issues concern a company's relationships with its stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the communities in which it operates. This pillar evaluates a company's commitment to creating a positive social impact and upholding human rights. Key considerations are:
- Employee health, safety, and wellbeing
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies
- Labour standards and supply chain management
- Customer privacy and data protection
- Community engagement and corporate citizenship
- Product safety and quality
Governance issues
Governance issues refer to the systems, processes, and controls that guide a company's operations and decision making. This pillar is fundamental to ensuring accountability, fairness, and transparency. It covers:
- Board composition, diversity, and independence
- Executive compensation and incentive structures
- Shareholder rights and stakeholder engagement
- Business ethics, anti corruption, and bribery policies
- Risk management frameworks and internal controls
- Transparency in reporting and tax strategy
ESG Standards Frameworks for Reporting
To ensure consistency and comparability, several international standards and frameworks have been developed for ESG reporting. These provide companies with structured guidelines for disclosing their sustainability performance. While multiple frameworks exist, some are particularly relevant in the EU context, especially with the introduction of the ESRS.
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): The GRI Standards are one of the most widely used frameworks for sustainability reporting globally. They offer a comprehensive set of modular standards that cover a wide range of economic, environmental, and social topics. Many organizations use GRI as a foundation for their reporting.
- European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS): Developed by EFRAG, the ESRS are the mandatory standards for companies reporting under the CSRD. They are designed to be interoperable with other key frameworks, including GRI, to reduce the reporting burden. The ESRS are built on the principle of double materiality.
- Other Frameworks: Other notable frameworks include those from the IFRS Foundation's International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the former Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), which provides industry specific disclosure topics.
EU Regulations: The CSRD, SFDR, and EU Taxonomy
The European Union has established a comprehensive regulatory framework to drive sustainable finance and corporate transparency. These regulations create new legal obligations for many companies operating in the EU.
Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)
The CSRD expands the scope and depth of sustainability reporting requirements for a large number of EU and non EU companies. It mandates that companies disclose their ESG performance in accordance with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). A key concept introduced by the CSRD is double materiality, which requires companies to report on both how sustainability issues affect their business (financial materiality) and how their business affects people and the planet (impact materiality).
Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)
The SFDR imposes transparency and disclosure obligations on financial market participants and financial advisers regarding the integration of sustainability risks and the consideration of adverse sustainability impacts in their processes. It aims to prevent greenwashing and help investors make more informed decisions by standardising how financial products are classified and described in terms of their sustainability objectives.
EU Taxonomy
The EU Taxonomy is a classification system that establishes a list of environmentally sustainable economic activities. It provides a common language for companies, investors, and policymakers to identify which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. To be Taxonomy-aligned, an activity must substantially contribute to at least one of six environmental objectives, do no significant harm to the others, and meet minimum social safeguards.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) What is the difference between CSRD and ESRS?
The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is the legal directive that mandates sustainability reporting for certain companies. The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) are the detailed, uniform standards that specify what information companies must report to comply with the CSRD. In short, CSRD is the law, and ESRS are the rules for implementing that law.
Who is required to report under the CSRD?
The CSRD applies in phases to a broad range of companies. This includes large EU public interest entities, other large EU companies, listed EU SMEs, and certain non-EU companies with significant activity in the EU. The thresholds are based on balance sheet total, net turnover, and number of employees.
What is double materiality in the context of ESRS?
Double materiality is a core principle of the ESRS. It requires a company to assess and report on sustainability matters from two perspectives:
- Impact Materiality The company’s actual or potential impacts on people and the environment.
- Financial Materiality The actual or potential financial risks and opportunities that sustainability matters create for the company.
A topic is considered material and must be reported if it meets the criteria for either or both perspectives.
How do GRI and ESRS work together?
The ESRS were developed to be highly interoperable with the GRI Standards. EFRAG and GRI worked to ensure a high degree of commonality between the two sets of standards, which means that companies reporting under ESRS will be considered to be reporting with reference to the GRI Standards. This alignment helps to streamline the reporting process and reduce duplication of effort.
Conclusion
Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance principles into corporate strategy is no longer optional for companies operating in the European Union. The regulatory landscape, led by the CSRD and supported by the ESRS and EU Taxonomy, demands a structured and transparent approach to sustainability. By understanding ESG issues, applying recognised standards, and adhering to EU regulations, organizations can manage risk, identify opportunities, and build long term value in a sustainable manner.
To begin assessing your organization's position and preparing for compliance, a methodical approach is required.
Speak with one of our experts to develop a clear roadmap for your ESG strategy and reporting obligations.
Book your demo!
